Ya se puede testear la RC2 de AOO 4.1.2
No es recomendable que se utilice en entornos de producción. Las pruebas, mejor con gaseosa.
Cuidado: Si se instala, sustituye la actual versión 4.x.x; por si acaso, puede ser muy recomendable renombrar o copiar antes la carpeta perfil del usuario
Para evaluar la RC2 se debe descargar desde https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
Si se verifica el buen funcionamiento, podeis marcar los bugs resueltos en https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?c ... harer_id=7
El mensaje:
(I'm forwarding this call for tests to the QA list and the l10n list)
It is very important to test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2 thoroughly: please download it from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
and use it for your normal tasks but also to mark as "VERIFIED" the bugs listed at
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?c ... harer_id=7
Bugs marked as RESOLVED FIXED must be set to VERIFIED or REOPENED. Note that many are still in RESOLVED FIXED state but have indeed been verified if you read the issue. In that case it is enough to change the issue status, but an extra verification is always helpful.
Remember, building a new Release Candidate takes time and effort, so:
- It is time to be more careful with release blockers: you can still propose a Release Blocker, but please accept that it will likely be denied unless we are sure that it is low-risk and important.
- I do not exclude that an RC3 will come, but we want RC2 to be fully tested before building it, and we must definitely avoid an RC4.
These bugs are now open for a possible RC3:
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126586 from Damjan; nedds more information, asked.
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=107619 Bug in Find & replace with regular expression: already accepted blocker, solution was incomplete in RC2, now supposedly fixed
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126582 When trying to access a read/only share on Sharepoint an error is shown: This is new but it addresses the same use case of the other Sharepoint fixes
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126573 Dictionaries were actually not updated in some cases, probably due to a not completely clean build, to be investigated
- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126588 Portuguese dictionary to be updated: I'll now ask the l10n list to suggest other possible dictionary updates.
So: not many bugs so far, and not so bad. But we will have the full picture only if everybody helps in testing, it's very easy to do so.
Regards,
Andrea.