|
|
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Porting/To-Dos==
| + | #redirect [[To-Dos]] |
| − | {{:Porting/To-Dos}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Tools==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Maintaining tinderbox builds for all available platforms===
| |
| − | | |
| − | * tinderbox@tools.openoffice.org
| |
| − | * Michael Meeks (mmeeks at openoffice.org)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===OpenOffice.org Platform Technology: Faster Startup===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Probably the most discussed problem since StarOffice 4.0. One first shot would be to optimize library exports.
| |
| − | Contact
| |
| − | | |
| − | * dev@tools.openoffice.org
| |
| − | * Martin Hollmichel (martin.hollmichel at sun.com)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Code Analysis===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Keeping the code flexible, maintainable, extensible, is highly desired. However the current state of the code is quite opaque. Providing tools to detect areas that became or become prone to be examined would be highly desirable.
| |
| − | Contact
| |
| − | | |
| − | * dev@tools.openoffice.org
| |
| − | * Martin Hollmichel (martin.hollmichel at sun.com)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==QA==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Official QA'ing of contributed builds===
| |
| − | | |
| − | From other locales or lesser known ports
| |
| − | Contact
| |
| − | | |
| − | * dev@porting.openoffice.org or dev@qa.openoffice.org
| |
| − | * Kevin Hendricks (khendricks at openoffice.org)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===More formal regression testing===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Contact
| |
| − | | |
| − | * dev@porting.openoffice.org
| |
| − | * Kevin Hendricks (khendricks at openoffice.org)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Bug Tracking System statistics===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Provide statistics issues submitted per time, number of active contributors, etc
| |
| − | | |
| − | * dev@tools.openoffice.org
| |
| − | * Martin Hollmichel (mh at openoffice.org)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Stats==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Source Code Repository Activity===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Provide statistics for CVS repository activity. The first step would be a quick analyse what type of statistics other projects are providing. Together with our requirement to better understand how the code base and groups of committers are evolving this should give input to start work on the preparation of some nice stats and graphs about repository activity. Results should be generated with open-source tools, automatically and on a regular basis for the http://stats.openoffice.org website. Additionally an interface to [http://cia.navi.cx] cia would be helpful.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * dev@stats.openoffice.org
| |
| − | * Stefan Taxhet (stefan.taxhet at sun.com)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | [[Category:Development]] [[Category:To-Do]]
| |
